Attack on FurFest '14
Started by: Azure | Replies: 71 | Views: 6,581
Dec 11, 2014 12:54 AM #1280734
It's not a loon. It's probably some guy who didn't know what he was doing. Something's been bothering me since I saw the first post and that is the fact that the perpetrator used Chlorine Gas. Isn't that oh I don't know...fatal? And yet 19 people are only seriously injured, I was half-expecting that there would be fatalities above those 19. Moreover, the event resumes after 2 hours and not entirely cancelled showing that the gas was just amateur hour as far as anyone's concerned.
Dec 11, 2014 9:11 PM #1281117
except he didn't use chlorine gas. if he did there would be fatalities, not injuries. that shit practically melts your lungs.
it was chlorine powder.
it was chlorine powder.
Dec 12, 2014 12:49 AM #1281213
I know. I'm just clarifying it for the people who might have misconstrued from the articles on the net. You read Chlorine. Then you read Gas Attack. And people are going to assume it's a Chlorine Gas Attack.
Dec 12, 2014 2:35 PM #1281402
'the fact that the perpetrator used chlorine gas"
guess that part threw me off
guess that part threw me off
Dec 13, 2014 3:23 PM #1281822
i find bdsm dominatrix child sex fetish more disturbing than a bunch of fur covered people boning each other
Dec 15, 2014 7:59 AM #1282583
I'm gonna expand on Hatchet's comment in response to the above.
Fact 3: The overwhelming majority of furries don't bang in their fursuits for two reasons that are obvious to me and any other costume artist.
- It's messy and risks damaging the costume due to friction (not only can it cause a rash, but most full suits are not equipped for such an activity)
- Fur, even the synthetic kind, traps body heat. Sex is a physical activity that can be exhausting when performed well, and it would get uncomfortably hot if done while wrapped in a fursuit.
Fact 3: The overwhelming majority of furries don't bang in their fursuits for two reasons that are obvious to me and any other costume artist.
- It's messy and risks damaging the costume due to friction (not only can it cause a rash, but most full suits are not equipped for such an activity)
- Fur, even the synthetic kind, traps body heat. Sex is a physical activity that can be exhausting when performed well, and it would get uncomfortably hot if done while wrapped in a fursuit.
Dec 18, 2014 3:16 PM #1283996
you're a fag i was joking
Dec 18, 2014 3:29 PM #1284000
It's been pretty well established that Grimm is a fucking idiot.
Evidence? The fact he felt like he even needed to explain how having sex in suits was uncomfortable, as if none of us had thought of that before.
Evidence? The fact he felt like he even needed to explain how having sex in suits was uncomfortable, as if none of us had thought of that before.
Dec 19, 2014 2:06 AM #1284219
Quote from Sadkoi find bdsm dominatrix child sex fetish more disturbing than a bunch of fur covered people boning each other
And the only way you would have known that is...?
Quote from Captain CookIt's been pretty well established that Grimm is a fucking idiot.
Evidence? The fact he felt like he even needed to explain how having sex in suits was uncomfortable, as if none of us had thought of that before.
Also the fact that I have already mentioned that yiffing is a passe/cliche term and nobody really does it in the way that people think during a CON. It's bullshit pop culture like that one CSI episode that purported this sub-culture out of proportion
Dec 19, 2014 3:24 AM #1284257
the only way i couldve known is my artistic imagination
Dec 19, 2014 3:30 AM #1284262
So you're saying that whipping children in leathery suits to dominate their feeble wills in an expression of Art?
Dec 19, 2014 11:43 AM #1284360
ayooo