Battle of the "Stars"

Started by: Shadowolf | Replies: 16 | Views: 1,460

Shadowolf
Banned

Posts: 107
Joined: Mar 2014
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 25, 2015 9:20 PM #1399182
A series of immense wormholes/portals opens.
They connect the realm of Star Trek with that of Star Wars.

For the sake of the poll, presume that each realm is possessed with an insatiable desire to rule/conquer/destroy the other.

Which wins?
Root
2

Posts: 522
Joined: Dec 2014
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 26, 2015 2:49 AM #1399237
It's a bit unclear who exactly is included in the fight from each universe, but considering that Star Wars overall is a bit more militaristic, I'd say they'd have and advantage.
Hewitt

Posts: 14,256
Joined: Jul 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 26, 2015 3:04 AM #1399243
Quote from Root
It's a bit unclear who exactly is included in the fight from each universe, but considering that Star Wars overall is a bit more militaristic, I'd say they'd have and advantage.


Yes, because a show about exploring space has absolutely no military races whatsoever.

Just not going to acknowledge THE BORG? What about those fucking Romulans?

But you know, you can argue all you want that those races aren't part of the Star Trek crew, when I can just drop one big deuce on you.


Q

Motherfucking Q. Omnipotent race of reality manipulators. Pretty much Star Trek's Dr. Who.


Thread over.
Root
2

Posts: 522
Joined: Dec 2014
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 26, 2015 4:07 AM #1399260
Quote from Hewitt
Yes, because a show about exploring space has absolutely no military races whatsoever.

Just not going to acknowledge THE BORG? What about those fucking Romulans?

But you know, you can argue all you want that those races aren't part of the Star Trek crew, when I can just drop one big deuce on you.


Q

Motherfucking Q. Omnipotent race of reality manipulators. Pretty much Star Trek's Dr. Who.


Thread over.

Never said Star Trek wasn't militaristic, but Star Wars is pretty much centered around a huge conflict full of the mass production of weapons. I'm not very familiar with Star Trek though, so I might be totally wrong.
Hewitt

Posts: 14,256
Joined: Jul 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 26, 2015 4:12 AM #1399263
Quote from Root
Blahblahblahblah star trek


Q, motherfuckers. Q.
Cook

Posts: 5,155
Joined: Nov 2009
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 26, 2015 4:14 AM #1399264
Lol no

Star Wars would fucking wreck Star Trek. They're not even on the same plane.

Look at the armament Star Destroyers have versus Federation ships. The Imperial fleet is also huge, and has much more resources at its disposal, as well as a bottomless army of highly trained stormtroopers.

Now, if we were talking 40k...
Root
2

Posts: 522
Joined: Dec 2014
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 26, 2015 4:26 AM #1399265
Quote from Captain Cook
Lol no

Star Wars would fucking wreck Star Trek. They're not even on the same plane.

Look at the armament Star Destroyers have versus Federation ships. The Imperial fleet is also huge, and has much more resources at its disposal, as well as a bottomless army of highly trained stormtroopers.

Now, if we were talking 40k...

I mean, there's a reason it's called, ya know, Star "Wars".
Hewitt

Posts: 14,256
Joined: Jul 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 26, 2015 5:09 AM #1399267
I dont think anyone's getting it.

All Q has to do is snap his fingers and you're all gone.
Cook

Posts: 5,155
Joined: Nov 2009
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 26, 2015 5:14 AM #1399268
No Deus-Ex shit

Like, you realize that Slave 1, if you actually read the lore, is capable of destroying any Federation ship completely by himself?

No OP shit dowg
Hewitt

Posts: 14,256
Joined: Jul 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 26, 2015 5:17 AM #1399271
It's not my fault that the pollmaker is lazy and didn't include any restrictions

What is seriously the difference between this poll and saying "HULK/GALACTUS PWNS all" in a DC vs Marvel thread
Cook

Posts: 5,155
Joined: Nov 2009
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 26, 2015 5:19 AM #1399272
yeah

it's like when people argue W40k/SW and say 40k is better because INSTANT DEMON POSSESSION EVERYONE DIES like fuck off

let's actually argue the virtues of Empire vs Fed
Hewitt

Posts: 14,256
Joined: Jul 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 26, 2015 5:21 AM #1399273
Look there has to be an omnipotent equivalent for Q on the Wars side. That would then still make this battle even. That's all I'm asking.

Whattabout the jedi people, dont they have a God of some sort?

Because I seriously doubt anyone would want to vote for Trek because nobody seems to know about how warlike their warlike races are.
Cook

Posts: 5,155
Joined: Nov 2009
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 26, 2015 2:51 PM #1399374
warlike races < Warlike empire spanning thousands of systems
PitchEnder
2

Posts: 1,008
Joined: May 2015
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 26, 2015 5:23 PM #1399389
I agree with captain cook.... For once
Salt
2

Posts: 5,455
Joined: Jun 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 26, 2015 5:33 PM #1399393
Did some research. The most powerful Sith to ever exist, both from a force perspective and influence, was Emperor Palpatine. He is recorded in star wars history as the most powerful being to have ever lived. There are less powerful Sith who can eradicate planets. He was essentially immortal as well. He could rent the fabric of space time to destroy enemy fleets.

However, I read somewhere else that Luke Skywalker is much more powerful than Palpatine, being the son of Anakin Skywalker who is essentially Force Jesus. Apparently Anakin had a lot more potential than Palpatine, but was taken by him to the Dark Side at a young age. Luke managed to get to the level Anakin was at in a relatively short time, and still grows more powerful.