Take it slow
Started by: slipnot. | Replies: 104 | Views: 7,781
AsePlayer2Posts: 2,240
Joined: Nov 2014
Rep: 10
View Profile If they really didn't want money then slip glitching member isn't be an issue.
Sarcastic sarcasm was sarcastic.
NyarlathotepPosts: 2,240
Joined: Jan 2013
Rep: 10
View Profile Sarcastic sarcasm was sarcastic.
Since the thread was about a serious issue I figured you'd not be an off topic dumbass as usual. Proceeding to mentally discredit anything you say.
AsePlayer2Posts: 2,240
Joined: Nov 2014
Rep: 10
View Profile Since the thread was about a serious issue I figured you'd not be an off topic dumbass as usual. Proceeding to mentally discredit anything you say.
It's obviously up to them, but bottom line is they are losing money. Maybe they have enough money from past projects to make it not their number one priority, idk.
Simply listing a fact that if they don't fix the problem, they don't want their money.
SevarusPosts: 905
Joined: Aug 2013
Rep: 10
View Profile It's obviously up to them, but bottom line is they are losing money. Maybe they have enough money from past projects to make it not their number one priority, idk.
Simply listing a fact that if they don't fix the problem, they don't want their money.
Of course they want money it's their business their livelihood who doesn't want too maximise their income?
Skeletonxf2Posts: 2,706
Joined: Aug 2013
Rep: 10
View Profile I will probably be ignored but I'll say it anyway. Someone who was never going to pay you for things they are meant to pay for and instead pirates them is not costing you a penny because you would never have obtained the money in the first place. Sure, they're stealing from you what they should have paid for, but they aren't stealing from your income, if that makes sense.
SevarusPosts: 905
Joined: Aug 2013
Rep: 10
View Profile I will probably be ignored but I'll say it anyway. Someone who was never going to pay you for things they are meant to pay for and instead pirates them is not costing you a penny because you would never have obtained the money in the first place. Sure, they're stealing from you what they should have paid for, but they aren't stealing from your income, if that makes sense.
That makes sense too me and you won't be ignored. The devs do care maybe they lack the facilities too change it
OdankuPosts: 29
Joined: May 2015
Rep: 10
View Profile I will probably be ignored but I'll say it anyway. Someone who was never going to pay you for things they are meant to pay for and instead pirates them is not costing you a penny because you would never have obtained the money in the first place. Sure, they're stealing from you what they should have paid for, but they aren't stealing from your income, if that makes sense.
That makes no sense, sorry. The membership is the work, time, and money of the devs. Haxxing for membership would be stealing their work, time, and money. Going with your logic, I could steal a car and it wouldn't affect anybody's income, except increase mine if I sell it.
MasterKaito2Posts: 1,176
Joined: Nov 2014
Rep: 10
View Profile That makes no sense, sorry. The membership is the work, time, and money of the devs. Haxxing for membership would be stealing their work, time, and money. Going with your logic, I could steal a car and it wouldn't affect anybody's income, except increase mine if I sell it.
Except a car costs money to manufacture
OdankuPosts: 29
Joined: May 2015
Rep: 10
View Profile Except a car costs money to manufacture
Good point, forget my example.
But that doesn't mean hacking membership costs nothing to the devs.
MasterKaito2Posts: 1,176
Joined: Nov 2014
Rep: 10
View Profile I think the appropriate term is "losing on an investment"
NyarlathotepPosts: 2,240
Joined: Jan 2013
Rep: 10
View Profile Good point, forget my example.
But that doesn't mean hacking membership costs nothing to the devs.
You can't prove that that would have bought it if not for the ability to get it for free.
AsePlayer2Posts: 2,240
Joined: Nov 2014
Rep: 10
View Profile You can't prove that that would have bought it if not for the ability to get it for free.
If he ranks with the illegally obtained membership, he should lose ratings. Because he possibly could not have gained that using Order only.
NyarlathotepPosts: 2,240
Joined: Jan 2013
Rep: 10
View Profile Again, that's another thing that you cannot prove. Baseless statements don't lead anywhere.
AsePlayer2Posts: 2,240
Joined: Nov 2014
Rep: 10
View Profile Again, that's another thing that you cannot prove. Baseless statements don't lead anywhere.
He litterally said he used membership hacks/glitches. Reset some ratings, because he ranked with membership quite a bit.
Skeletonxf2Posts: 2,706
Joined: Aug 2013
Rep: 10
View Profile You can't prove that that would have bought it if not for the ability to get it for free.
My point exactly