SP Mafia VII: Avengers, Disassembled! | GAME OVER: Congratulations to the Skrull!

Started by: Hewitt | Replies: 744 | Views: 69,560

Exile
Administrator
2

Posts: 8,404
Joined: Dec 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
Dec 8, 2015 8:36 PM #1421785
It's up to you guys, really. as of right now they both seem like prime candidates assuming your memory is accurate.
Not_Nish
2

Posts: 10,837
Joined: Mar 2010
Rep: 10

View Profile
Dec 8, 2015 8:37 PM #1421786
Yes but Apex is a prime candidate regardless of my memory. Thats why I asked. But I do think Devour is the bigger threat among the two because he seems to give a shit about the game. Also Apex can have a chance to redeem himself, we can FORCE him to protect the person of your choosing if he wants to 'prove' he isn't Mafia. Devour's powers are mostly useless apart from just to protect himself. So maybe it should remain on Devour.
Mantha
2

Posts: 8,267
Joined: Sep 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
Dec 8, 2015 8:41 PM #1421787
I gotta ask, who WAS protected in N3 if not Boomy? Was anyone at all?
Not_Nish
2

Posts: 10,837
Joined: Mar 2010
Rep: 10

View Profile
Dec 8, 2015 8:46 PM #1421788
He didn't tell Exile who he was protecting, so we'll have to wait from Apex and I'm sure he'll give us some bullshit answer. He better have a fucking good reason not to have protected Boom. It is impossible that Apex can't be a Mafia, in my mind, but he isn't dangerous because we all know who he is. So we lynch Devour first, and then Apex.
Mantha
2

Posts: 8,267
Joined: Sep 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
Dec 8, 2015 8:59 PM #1421789
Yeah, absolutely. I'm on board, I was just asking.

I better stop posting when I'm tired, else I'll be eating my own words about being more careful.
Apex-Predator
2

Posts: 4,296
Joined: Mar 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Dec 8, 2015 10:41 PM #1421810
Quote from Exile
#vote apex

he said he was going to protect Boomer last night, changed his mind at the very last second and didn't tell me who his new target is. I genuinely can't think of a reason to keep him around.


[spoiler=]
Image
[/spoiler]
I guess I should have given a name, that would have been more helpful. My bad!
Devour
Administrator
1

Posts: 9,916
Joined: Apr 2008
Rep: 10

View Profile
Dec 8, 2015 11:35 PM #1421815
Oh dear. How to defend against something that was done before I was even playing?
Quote from Not_Nish
I'm foolish foolish foolish. I am really very foolish and I can't believe this slipped past me. Guys, I received a PM from Lami at the start of the game, but I deleted it because I needed my inbox clear and because I thought it was a stupid idea to begin with and I brushed it out of my mind. Foolish foolish foolish. After I chewed out Zero for telling me who to jump on in public, Lamitrov pm'ed me and said that the Hulk was the safest player in the game for me to jump onto, and that I probably should latch on to the Hulk. I don't remember his reasoning but I thought he was being helpful because a LOT of ideas were being thrown around then about where I should jump, including Enjoy's amazing chart.

If Xate had died on the first night, my suspicions would have been aroused but by the time, but he didn't and I let it go and I seem to have forgotten about it as just another suggestion from a guy learning Mafia for the first time. I'm seeing only now from Exile that Xate DID get attacked on the first night, foolish foolish foolish. Either Lamitrov gave me an incredibly co-incidental guess, or he knew what they were planning to do. It also answers my question as to WHY they would want to lynch someone like Xate / Hulk in the first place when so many more vital Avengers were left untouched. They were trying to kill two birds in one stone.

Sorry Devour, but you're back on my suspects list seeing how you replaced Lamitrov. I'm also sorry guys, for letting this slip my mind. I've been busy and occupied IRL for reasons I've explained and this seems to have completely slipped under my radar.

This totally blows me away. Why would a mafia player who has their sights set on Ant-Man, early in the game with so many protections, act so catastrophically suspicious to go after the hardest target to kill in the game? And one of the lowest priority ones, too. You don't have any night abilities.
The mafia would want people like Raptor and Mantha and Coulson out asap as possible, and then move onto shielders maybe. I really see no reason why they would have wanted to go after you.

My theory is that Lami was trying really hard to get on your good side and appear innocent because you're usually the first guy to take control of the town. You've buttblasted him before in previous games. No mafia would be stupid enough to paint a neon target on their backs for maximum risk and minimum gain. I think I know what really happened, but I'll address that later in my post.

I've been playing so hard for the town all game long as soon as I got here. On day 2 I fought against Zero's apathy to actually getting things accomplished, and succeeded. Now the town is active again and the thread is full of people talking and actually figuring shit out. I've been playing so actively because I want to utilize my Iron Man ability. They have to waste 2 turns killing me. As of right now I know I still have two lives left, so I'm going to fight to hell and back to win this for the town.

Quote from Exile
that is some grade-A bullshit Lamitrov was feeding you. he never once PMed me (devour hasn't yet either), if he had a single reason to trust Xate AND reason to trust you with that information AND was legitimately on my side you would think he would mention it to me. I got nothing. What could he possibly think he could organize behind-the-scenes to the benefit of the town on D1 without involving me in any way whatsoever?

I don't have a night ability. Of course I wouldn't PM you, there's nothing to say :p What could I provide except, "I do nothing" every single night?
That's the thing though. I don't think Lami was trying to benefit the town exactly--he was probably trying to make Nish like him and potentially take him under his wing and protect him if he ever got a finger pointed his way.

Quote from Nish]I think his pm was more along the lines of advice, because they were all in the midst of a discussion in the thread about what Ant Man should do, and I was yelling at Zero for telling me to stay put (my problem wasn't his advice but the fact that he was saying it in public). But the pieces do fit. It explains why they went after Hulk. I don't think he said we could trust Xate. But I assumed he felt that even if Xate was Mafia, they wouldn't target each other. But the overall gist of the message, like I said, was that Ant-Man should shrink on to the Hulk because that would be the safest place. Fortunately, I was in a much safer hiding place for both rounds.[/quote]

I did a bit of skimming the previous pages and found this discussion. Here, you said:
Quote from Not_NishI don't get the math either on how NOT using my powers is actually mathematically better. What if I was to latch on to Iron Man or the Hulk who are protected from one kill-action?
Was this from before Lamitrov PM'd you? Either way, let me get to my real point.
In this phase of the game, Loki was still alive. Let's look at it from his point of view. To Loki, you're indeed one of the most influential members in the game. You have always been good for rallying the town to lynch a suspected Mafia. Now, with you announcing that either me or Hulk would be good targets for you to hop onto, which out of the two of us would he choose to kill in trying to kill you? He would go after the Hulk and potentially kill him in one night, rather than being forced to wail on Iron Man twice.

I think Loki attacked the Hulk, missed, and attacked again rather than wasting [I
another[/I] two turns hitting Iron Man. He's the one who would actually want you dead, and you're the one who was actually a threat to him. Going after you early is exactly what the Mafia would not want to do, and doing so after prodding you to maybe hop onto the Hulk and maybe get a kill (and mind you, if it fails then Lamitrov suddenly has a huge target on his face for zero gain) is silly.

[quote=Nish]Assuming both Apex and Devour are Mafia, as we suspect, this could have been a beautiful plan for them to pull the wool over our eyes. Apex, because his role is vital to the strategy, and Devour because he can now claim to have contributed a potentially life-saving plan. All while happily picking us off one by one.


Apex has been disappointing to me all game long. He's standing for what I was trying super hard to fight against: town-wide apathy to just let the game run while being too bored to contribute anything. My plan was a plan to make him actually be useful for once, because at the time I was still sure Apex just didn't give a damn about the game. I don't have anything to do with him outside of that.

I'm still arguing for something I wasn't even around to see. But know that I am absolutely for the town, and I will die to help save the game if I must. Don't let mob mentality bring me down because I've been showing my innocence through action from the moment I got here and I absolutely will refute any points at me that I might be Mafia. Just be reasonable and let me actually defend myself, or we'll just have another repeat of Raptor, and almost every mafia game here beforehand.

Edit: I see you lurkin' Zero. I don't mean it was only your apathy. It was something that gripped the entire town at the time. It was just you I was talking to at that moment, with my attempts to get things going being brushed off.

Edit 2: Everyone who could reply is offline right now, so I'm just sitting here waiting for responses...

I've been doing some thinking, and I'm starting to have some serious suspicions and ideas on what happened to Raptor. But I'm not going to bring this up until I've cleared my name.
Hewitt

Posts: 14,256
Joined: Jul 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Dec 9, 2015 1:45 AM #1421825
Quote from Exile
that doesn't rule out the possibility that he used his ability in the previous rounds which is what I'm assuming he's checking for.


Read the first post, Exile. Scarlet Witch can only scry ONCE.
Youwishjellyfish
2

Posts: 1,875
Joined: Sep 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Dec 9, 2015 1:47 AM #1421826
Quote from Exile
also I am genuinely asking you guys, can you think of a scenario in which three players can die in one night that doesn't involve Dr. Strange? Coulson (aka Loki) can die by visiting a Skrull during the night but that would require Loki abandoning his nightkill, so that still leaves one kill unaccounted for. if the only possible explanation is that Dr Strange interfered and Apex made no effort to inform me of it then I say we lynch him first.

Loki can use both his ability and his night kill each night.

First of all I'm gonna hold off on my vote, I don't want D4 to end just 24 hours after it started lol, especially since I think we have so much to talk about.

When it comes to Apex vs Devour then I'm still leaning towards Apex. He's been useless since D1, never grasped that he needed to PM Exile even after it was discussed and even after Exile told people in the thread to PM him multiple times, during D1 Exile said that Dr Strange should visit Zero (I'm assuming so we could get as many gifts as possible) but he visited Hawkeye instead, he's admitted that he was posting derpy posts because that was all that was required of him, he gave up and didn't defend himself when under fire, and then changed his N3 target at the last minute for no apparent reason. Versus Devour who is under fire for a PM that was sent by a noob and which we'll never see lol.

Guys, we don't have a random lynch looming over our heads anymore (we don't do we?!) so we have the time to press Devour and go back through his posts to find something that is actually suspicious.

That said I also wanted to know about the Skype group. Who was in it, how long was it going on for, what was talked about there (other than what was shown to us), and if there was a 'no maifa' policy why was there conversation going over multiple hours in what Devour posted here?

I'd also like us to look into Zero. One mistake is often just that, two might even be a coincidence, but there is a pattern growing with Zero. D1 he wanted Nish not to use his ability and we shrugged it off, D2 he voted for one person but not the other when they were guilty of the same thing and we shrugged it off, D3 he does the same thing (EDIT: to clarify I'm talking about Mantha calling him out on his inconsistent reasoning's) and then draws attention to Boomerang who had been keeping a pretty low profile and it looks like we're about to shrug that off to lol.
Hewitt

Posts: 14,256
Joined: Jul 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Dec 9, 2015 1:56 AM #1421827
Oh yeah, forgot to Update:

Apex - Zero
Devour - Exile, Mantha, Nish

No Vote - devi, YWJ, Apex, Envoy, Devour


Quote from Youwishjellyfish
Guys, we don't have a random lynch looming over our heads anymore (we don't do we?!) so we have the time to press Devour and go back through his posts to find something that is actually suspicious.


Uhhh yes we do, read my original D4 post where I've appended this.

To explain, the RandomLynch rule has been implemented to prevent "Leading", which is basically the Town going silent and relying on that one guy that will win it (Exilement). RandomLynching encourages the actual game to happen by bringing the opinions of many into the fold and to also prevent inactives or force inactives to look more suspicious than they ought to be.



I also like to clear something up for the sake of neutrality: I couldn't get ahold of Lamitrov after I replaced him. We had one out of topic PM conversation and that's it. I would have loved to let Lami share whatever info he has done so far with Devour, but unfortunately he could not. All Devour has to base on is what's been happening so far. Make of that what you will.
Youwishjellyfish
2

Posts: 1,875
Joined: Sep 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Dec 9, 2015 3:46 AM #1421844
Quote from Hewitt
Uhhh yes we do, read my original D4 post where I've appended this.

To explain, the RandomLynch rule has been implemented to prevent "Leading", which is basically the Town going silent and relying on that one guy that will win it (Exilement). RandomLynching encourages the actual game to happen by bringing the opinions of many into the fold and to also prevent inactives or force inactives to look more suspicious than they ought to be.

Your like an evil reality TV producer...


Guys our ideas about what's been happening during the Nights still doesn't make sense to me. At the moment we're thinking the Skrull killed Xate, but it doesn't quite fit. This is how people are describing it:
N1
Skrull kills Xate, Xate redirects to Hawkeye, but Hawkeye doesn't die N1 due to the delay.
Loki seemingly does nothing/hits a shield or armour/I successfully stopped a kill as there is still an unaccounted death.
N2
Hawkeye dies because of the delay
Skrull kills Xate again because they know he burned his power, Xate dies
Loki can no longer be killed by Skrull because they used their Kill, so the only way Loki can die is because he visited a Skrull. That means all the deaths are accounted for, but it also means that Loki once again didn't kill anyone. If Skrull were the people to kill Xate then we should have seen another body when D3 came around should have killed someone too. (This is assuming all killing actions happen at the same time).
En
2

Posts: 2,481
Joined: May 2009
Rep: 10

View Profile
Dec 9, 2015 3:49 AM #1421845
Quote from Mantha
Also, where is En?

I was stuck in my sleeping bucket. Anywho.

I still think Apex is extremely suspect. He is riding on the wave of a defence someone else gave him, not his own. Raptor, who actually tried to protect himself was killed because he didn’t answer a couple of questions. So someone who has answered barely any questions gets away, while someone who answers significantly more questions dies even if they missed a few. Here’s the thing about people who don’t talk: You don’t put yourself at any risk while people who do and make small mistakes get all the hurt. Even when pressed what does he do? Give a screenshot of his PM which Exile already knows. He’s making the game more confusing.

And what’s with this skype group existing in the first place? What compelled you guys to be so trusting of one another? Why the fuck wasn’t I invited :C?

Quote from Not_Nish
I still don't understand why they went after Hawkeye and Hulk first though. It makes no sense to me. I do understand going after Coulson. But why those two? I think its safe to assume that Error used Loki's touch of death on him? Because otherwise he'd prob still be alive.

Hawkeye is a backup. Even if they kill a useful member now they have to deal with him once again. So on the surface he looks like a “meh” character, but he does have potential. He is also an unlikely target (proof by your confusion) to attack imo which meant they felt safer attacking him. Hulk… well, it can hurt them but I have no idea why they would target him first. As with my previous post I believed that Error death touched him.

I don’t think the Skrulls are stupid enough to rely on someone like Lamitrov to try convince Nish where to jump and basing their plans around that. Too many moving parts. If it was part of the Skrull’s plan it is a ridiculously noobish and really low success move.

Also no one has any thoughts on Devi?
Not_Nish
2

Posts: 10,837
Joined: Mar 2010
Rep: 10

View Profile
Dec 9, 2015 5:10 AM #1421854
#unvote Devour
#vote Apex

I would urge Mantha and Exile to do the same, especially after Devour's defense. Since Exilement said it was up to us, I hope he won't mind. I think Devour is STILL suspect, but we're 100% sure on Apex and about 90% sure on Devour. So I think Apex needs to go first. Also, his screenshot of the PM to Exile just annoys the fuck out of me. I'm very close to creating my own 'Mafia Acquaintance Ban List', which is a group of people who I will never, ever play Mafia with because they just make it less fun. Apex is very close to getting into that list with how little he seems to care.
Devour
Administrator
1

Posts: 9,916
Joined: Apr 2008
Rep: 10

View Profile
Dec 9, 2015 5:17 AM #1421856
Quote from Not_Nish
#unvote Devour
#vote Apex

I would urge Mantha and Exile to do the same, especially after Devour's defense. Since Exilement said it was up to us, I hope he won't mind. I think Devour is STILL suspect, but we're 100% sure on Apex and about 90% sure on Devour. So I think Apex needs to go first. Also, his screenshot of the PM to Exile just annoys the fuck out of me. I'm very close to creating my own 'Mafia Acquaintance Ban List', which is a group of people who I will never, ever play Mafia with because they just make it less fun. Apex is very close to getting into that list with how little he seems to care.

Well, sweet. Definitely bring up that remaining 90% to me some time, because I will happily refute all of it. I want to be very open and clear that I'm for the town and that I can back it up with actions and words.

For starters, I agree that we should vote Apex. Especially because he chose not to protect Boomerang and he was in the skype chat to see that Boomy planned on using it last night. But we also have a lot more suspicious players, and we should question them before trying to end the day.
Not_Nish
2

Posts: 10,837
Joined: Mar 2010
Rep: 10

View Profile
Dec 9, 2015 6:15 AM #1421866
Devour, have you voted yet? It might save your skin if you do.