Quote from Nish

You thought you'd catch them in the act this early in the game? Just curious.

i saw a chance and i took it

Quote from Youwishjellyfish

As for a team I think Nish, Gyoh, Devi, Zed, or Ai could be some good candidates. I'm more proposing this team because we might be able to get some answers on some high-risk players, though, I do recognize this is a pretty high-risk team and if we're sending them in after a shrine fail we could very well end up with two back to back failures. Thoughts?

I agree seeing those are the only ones who have given some significant feedback on the missions.

Quote from Youwishjellyfish

and that involves Smile sending Nish the PM structure from the previous game and then Nish doing a whole lot of photoshopping.

for the record, I never got the pm with a proper format. All I got was "The game's almost done anyways so you're in. You're a knight", or something like that. But there's also the possibility of Nish asking Hewitt to pm him the proper format, then Nish took a screenshot of that. That's honestly the only possibility I can think of.

And honestly the only way I can think of on how we can proceed is to reuse the same team plus a random player if we were to win. That's honestly as far ahead as I can plan without disregarding the future possible reactions of the players.

"BOOYAH-ETH!" ~Sir Smile


Sir Nish the Nipple Inspector, Sir Smile the Joviant, and Sir Youwishjellyfish the Slippery have returned. And the mission was a....SUCCESS!!!

The Second Shrine

"It is imperative that we manage to reunite the indigenous RHG Tribes. They will be of great help on our quest to acquire the right to enter their Shrine of Virtue, which to these natives appear to be a primitive-looking stele. ~Journal of Juju'Tzu"


This 2nd Mission requires four knights to complete.

These are the Leader rotations for this Shrine:

1) Sir Ai the Brief
2) Sir Gaaading the Curious
3) Sir devi the listless
4) Sir Gyohdon the Brave
5) Sir Sadko the ALL CAPS


Ai, please rise and give your speech. Feel free to elect anyone you deem worthy to do this mission. You may even nominate yourself if you wish. Declaring a Team must be your first post in this round.


Once your Leader has posted his nomination, everyone in this thread is expected to vote privately by PM-ing #approve or #disapprove to me. You cannot change your vote once you do so. Voting will last until 36-hours after the last significant discussion post or until everyone has voted. I will reveal the votals after that and the mission would commence soon after!

This success doesn't mean anyone is definitely innocent or anything, but I think it makes the three of us less riskier than the idle players. I think reusing the previous team has a better chance of winning rather than completely using a different set of people. If we did use a different set of players in the team, then we'd be throwing what we've learned in this mission out the window and go back to square one. That would mean that the spies are now one step ahead of us. I say we go for the same team, and the random person is up to your discretion, Ai.

I'd like to point out that I suggested a pretty risky and controversial team to go if the 1st shrine failed, and I saw both Devi and Sadko viewing the thread but neither gave an opinion. Is there a reason for this guys?

If I saw anything from watching the last game it's that not sharing your thoughts and suspicions only helps the Spies.

Seeing the first team as a low risk just because of one succes is a major problem. In the last game we already learned that spies cooperating for the first mission will help them a lot.

Don't let successes affect a persons risk level. Let their posts and votes do that.


I propose a team of Sadko, Gaading, AI and ForgottenUser

Yes I understand that, but this early in the game I don't see anything that would be worth making a whole discussion about.

Quote from Smile

Yes I understand that, but this early in the game I don't see anything that would be worth making a whole discussion about.

How about the fact that there was not a single disapproving vote?
The fact that no one besides me argued against a decision made by three people that seemed to be working together?

I think the spies are already in control and if no one does anything against that, we're fucked.

I most likely am just viewing without basing any opinion as my keyboard had some pretty rough shit with it and I finally got to do stuff. Alright, I think that we should once again divide the members into "parties" and base them as low risk, middle risk, and high risk. But as gyohdon said it might very well not be affecting their overall spyability if they just thought to point towards positive instead of negative.

How do you disapprove a team that is really low-risk when you have no other information and not look suspicious?
Anyone that voted #disapprove would have an instant target on them. You even said you did that play to bait Spies into disapproving that team...

I'm going to sleep, but I'm cool with reusing us three and having any +1 bar Devi, but I think Zed might be a good choice.

Quote from Gyohdon

How about the fact that there was not a single disapproving vote?
The fact that no one besides me argued against a decision made by three people that seemed to be working together?

I think the spies are already in control and if no one does anything against that, we're fucked.

Honestly I think it was because we really did have a good point. I don't know what else to say about nobody disapproving other than the fact that nobody can really refute what we said. Hewitt confirmed that what we claim to have happened REALLY DID happen. If you're implying that the three of us are spies, and the only way of backing that claim up is because we "seemed to have been working together" while completely ignoring the possibility that we actually were telling the truth, then I don't know what to say to you.

Quote from Smile

Honestly I think it was because we really did have a good point. I don't know what else to say about nobody disapproving other than the fact that nobody can really refute what we said. Hewitt confirmed that what we claim to have happened REALLY DID happen. If you're implying that the three of us are spies, and the only way of backing that claim up is because we "seemed to have been working together" while completely ignoring the possibility that we actually were telling the truth, then I don't know what to say to you.

Sure bud, let's just ignore that Jelly just said Zed would be a good choice, yet there is not a single shred of proof for that.

You four are spies and I know it.

Quote from Gyohdon

Sure bud, let's just ignore that Jelly just said Zed would be a good choice, yet there is not a single shred of proof for that.

You four are spies and I know it.

yet you're proposing Sadko, Gaading, AI and ForgottenUser. I'm not sure how different they are from Zed, other than the fact that only Zed has voiced out his arguments.

Quote from Smile

yet you're proposing Sadko, Gaading, AI and ForgottenUser. I'm not sure how different they are from Zed, other than the fact that only Zed has voiced out his arguments.

The fact I don't know anything about them is the reason I want them in the next mission.